Skip to main content

[FL] [FL] Can I self-represent in a code enforcement proceeding?

Hi... I’m in Miami-Dade County, FL. I have a case about municipal courts (or mayor’s court). I’m arguing pro se at the moment. There are several components to the case, but the big one is a county ordinance that states code enforcement hearings will not be based on common law or general law (statutes/constitution). The Florida Supreme Court abolished these courts in the 1970s and reformed Article V (Judicial Branch) of the Florida Constitution. Question is, what are my chances and do you know any attorneys in South Florida who would take this case? The judge ordered me (verbally at hearing) to get an attorney. Not a good sign.

12

4

Angelo M
Angelo M

14,444 satisfied customers

View context
Solved

You’re in Miami-Dade County dealing with what they’re calling a municipal or code enforcement type proceeding, and you’ve noticed something that has troubled lawyers in Florida for decades. Back in the 1970s, the Florida Supreme Court indeed struck down the old mayor’s courts and other quasi-judicial local courts, folding them into the circuit and county court system when Article V of the state constitution was re-written. That’s why today you don’t see “mayor’s courts” in Florida the way you do in some other states like Louisiana or Ohio.

What you do see are administrative hearings for code enforcement, which are set up under Chapter 162 of the Florida Statutes. These hearings are conducted by “special magistrates” or code enforcement boards, and they are explicitly allowed by statute, but they are not “courts” in the sense of the judicial branch.

The ordinance language you mention, where Miami-Dade purports to say the hearings are not bound by “common law” or “general law,” is their way of saying the board or hearing officer is applying the county code, not handling general criminal or civil jurisdiction. But of course, the Florida Constitution and state statutes still trump local ordinances. Any ordinance that truly said “we don’t follow the constitution or statutes” would not survive a serious challenge.

The case law in Florida makes clear that administrative boards must stay within the authority given them by the legislature, and any ruling they make is subject to appeal or certiorari review in county court. That is your safety valve: even if the local board claims it doesn’t apply constitutional principles, the circuit or county court certainly does, and you can raise those issues on appeal.

Now, on the practical question you raised about “your chances.” If you go in pro se and argue that the entire code enforcement scheme is unconstitutional, most hearing officers will not entertain it — they will say you have to raise constitutional issues on appeal, not at the hearing. That’s probably why the judge in your matter told you to retain an attorney. It is not necessarily a sign that you’ve lost, but rather that you’re raising issues that require formal briefing and appellate-style argument.

A lawyer admitted in Florida, especially one with experience in administrative law or municipal law, will be better positioned to frame the constitutional challenge in a way that gives you a real shot.

As for referrals, I can’t hand you a specific name in this format, but in South Florida your best starting point is the Dade County Bar Association’s Lawyer Referral Service (www.miamidadebar.org). They can connect you with attorneys who take municipal and administrative cases. You might also reach out to the Florida Association of Code Enforcement directory to find lawyers who practice in this space. In addition, appellate attorneys in Miami, such as those who handle cert petitions from administrative boards, are the kind of lawyers who would take on the constitutional angle.

If cost is a barrier, you may want to contact Legal Aid Society of Miami-Dade, which sometimes has a municipal defense unit, or the University of Miami School of Law clinic, where advanced students under supervision sometimes handle code enforcement and housing-related matters.

In short, your instinct is right that the ordinance language looks overreaching, but the framework is set by state law and will ultimately be reviewed in the courts of record, not at the code enforcement hearing. Your chances depend greatly on whether you pursue it as a direct appeal from an adverse order and whether you have experienced counsel.

If you continue pro se, I’d urge you to focus on building a clean record, making timely objections, and filing any notices of appeal within the short statutory deadlines.

I hope I was able to help you and answer all of your questions and concerns. Is there any part of my response that you need clarification on or any further information? Did you have any other questions on this subject for me today?

0

Full Conversation


Hi... I’m in Miami-Dade County, FL. I have a case about municipal courts (or mayor’s court). I’m arguing pro se at the moment. There are several components to the case, but the big one is a county ordinance that states code enforcement hearings will not be based on common law or general law (statutes/constitution). The Florida Supreme Court abolished these courts in the 1970s and reformed Article V (Judicial Branch) of the Florida Constitution. Question is, what are my chances and do you know any attorneys in South Florida who would take this case? The judge ordered me (verbally at hearing) to get an attorney. Not a good sign.

Lexi

Lexi, Chatbot

I understand that navigating the complexities of municipal court cases can be quite challenging. Have you already filed any motions or documents related to your case?

Yes. The initial complaint and exhibits are filed.

Lexi

Lexi, Chatbot

Are there specific aspects of the county ordinance or the judge’s ruling that you believe are particularly problematic?

Yes

Lexi

Lexi, Chatbot

Is there anything else the lawyer should know before I connect you? Rest assured they’ll be able to help with your municipal court case.

The attorney should know that the assistant county attorney who is responsible for hiring, disciplining, and terminating hearing officers (trial judges not licensed to practice law/average citizens with no legal background) prosecuted me at the hearing.

Angelo M

Angelo M

Greetings! I hope this message finds you well. My name is Angelo, and I'm an experienced and licensed attorney with over 41 years of practice in the field of law. I'm thrilled to have the opportunity to assist you with your situation and provide you with the support you need. Please know that I may be assisting other clients simultaneously, but I assure you that I will give your case the attention it deserves as soon as possible.

Please do NOT request a second opinion. I WILL respond. Thank you for your patience, and I look forward to working with you.

Angelo M

Angelo M

You’re in Miami-Dade County dealing with what they’re calling a municipal or code enforcement type proceeding, and you’ve noticed something that has troubled lawyers in Florida for decades. Back in the 1970s, the Florida Supreme Court indeed struck down the old mayor’s courts and other quasi-judicial local courts, folding them into the circuit and county court system when Article V of the state constitution was re-written. That’s why today you don’t see “mayor’s courts” in Florida the way you do in some other states like Louisiana or Ohio.

What you do see are administrative hearings for code enforcement, which are set up under Chapter 162 of the Florida Statutes. These hearings are conducted by “special magistrates” or code enforcement boards, and they are explicitly allowed by statute, but they are not “courts” in the sense of the judicial branch.

The ordinance language you mention, where Miami-Dade purports to say the hearings are not bound by “common law” or “general law,” is their way of saying the board or hearing officer is applying the county code, not handling general criminal or civil jurisdiction. But of course, the Florida Constitution and state statutes still trump local ordinances. Any ordinance that truly said “we don’t follow the constitution or statutes” would not survive a serious challenge.

The case law in Florida makes clear that administrative boards must stay within the authority given them by the legislature, and any ruling they make is subject to appeal or certiorari review in county court. That is your safety valve: even if the local board claims it doesn’t apply constitutional principles, the circuit or county court certainly does, and you can raise those issues on appeal.

Now, on the practical question you raised about “your chances.” If you go in pro se and argue that the entire code enforcement scheme is unconstitutional, most hearing officers will not entertain it — they will say you have to raise constitutional issues on appeal, not at the hearing. That’s probably why the judge in your matter told you to retain an attorney. It is not necessarily a sign that you’ve lost, but rather that you’re raising issues that require formal briefing and appellate-style argument.

A lawyer admitted in Florida, especially one with experience in administrative law or municipal law, will be better positioned to frame the constitutional challenge in a way that gives you a real shot.

As for referrals, I can’t hand you a specific name in this format, but in South Florida your best starting point is the Dade County Bar Association’s Lawyer Referral Service (www.miamidadebar.org). They can connect you with attorneys who take municipal and administrative cases. You might also reach out to the Florida Association of Code Enforcement directory to find lawyers who practice in this space. In addition, appellate attorneys in Miami, such as those who handle cert petitions from administrative boards, are the kind of lawyers who would take on the constitutional angle.

If cost is a barrier, you may want to contact Legal Aid Society of Miami-Dade, which sometimes has a municipal defense unit, or the University of Miami School of Law clinic, where advanced students under supervision sometimes handle code enforcement and housing-related matters.

In short, your instinct is right that the ordinance language looks overreaching, but the framework is set by state law and will ultimately be reviewed in the courts of record, not at the code enforcement hearing. Your chances depend greatly on whether you pursue it as a direct appeal from an adverse order and whether you have experienced counsel.

If you continue pro se, I’d urge you to focus on building a clean record, making timely objections, and filing any notices of appeal within the short statutory deadlines.

I hope I was able to help you and answer all of your questions and concerns. Is there any part of my response that you need clarification on or any further information? Did you have any other questions on this subject for me today?

Do you have a contact number at the University of Miami School of Law clinic?

Angelo M

Angelo M

I don't have a direct contact number for the University of Miami School of Law clinic at hand, but you can usually find their contact information on the university's official website under the law school's clinical programs section. They often have a directory or contact page where you can get in touch with the right department.

Angelo M

Angelo M

Thank you so much for your questions. Thank you so much for giving me the opportunity to assist you, and please don't hesitate to reach out if you have any further questions or concerns.

Angelo M

Angelo M

14,444 satisfied customers

Criminal law, employment law, family law, landlord-tenant, and real estate law.

Angelo M
Welcome! Have a similar question?

5 lawyers online now

Disclaimer


By messaging AskaLawyer.com, you agree to our Terms and have read our Privacy Policy.

The information provided on AskaLawyer.com is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and timeliness of the information presented, we make no guarantees regarding its completeness or applicability to your specific circumstances.

Use of this website does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and AskaLawyer.com or any of its attorneys. Communications through this website, including any responses from attorneys, are not privileged or confidential. For advice tailored to your individual situation, we recommend consulting a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction.

AskaLawyer.com disclaims any liability for actions taken or not taken based on the content of this site. We are not responsible for any third-party content that may be accessed through this website. Reliance on any information provided herein is solely at your own risk.

Ask a Lawyer Logo
Ask a Lawyer Logo
Intake Questions
Step of 3
Loading...
Loading...

How do you like to pay?

By proceeding with payment, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy. You authorize us to charge $ today and $ thereafter until canceled. You may cancel anytime in the My Account section to stop future charges.

Total Due:

After purchasing, your chat will begin with an attorney.

By proceeding with payment, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy. You authorize us to charge $ today and $ thereafter until canceled. You may cancel anytime in the My Account section to stop future charges.

Total Due:

After purchasing, your chat will begin with an attorney.

It looks like you already have an account with Ask a Lawyer.

We have sent you a magic link to . Click the link in your email to sign in and continue your chat.

spin

Step of 6 •

You'll receive an email at as soon as the lawyer joins the conversation 🙏🏻😊

Over 90% of lawyers connect within 5 minutes. If you're not online at that moment, don't worry — the lawyer will reply to your message while you're away.

You're also welcome to stay in the chat while waiting to be connected 💬✨

Waiting for lawyer